International Trade Theories (Mercantilism, Absolute Cost Advantage, Comparative Cost Advantage Theory, Factor Endowment Theory, International Product Life Cycle Theory, Porter’s Diamond Theory, and New Trade Theory) Unit IV MBA Pokhara University

 

International Trade Theories 

International trade enhances economic efficiency, fosters global cooperation, and improves living standards by providing access to a wider variety of goods and services. However, it can also lead to trade disputes and job displacement in certain industries.

International trade refers to the exchange of goods, services, and capital across international borders. It allows countries to expand their markets, access resources not available domestically, and benefit from comparative advantage—producing goods more efficiently than other nations.

Reasons for International Trade

1.     Resource Availability – Some countries lack certain materials (e.g., Nepal imports oil).

2.     Cost Efficiency – Producing goods where labor/materials are cheaper (e.g., China manufacturing electronics).

3.     Consumer Demand – Access to diverse products (e.g., French wine in the U.S.).

4.     Economic Growth – Boosts GDP by increasing exports (e.g., Germany’s auto exports).

Examples of International Trade

1.     Goods Trade

o    U.S. imports electronics from China & India (e.g., iPhones).

o    Saudi Arabia exports oil to Europe and Asia.

o    Brazil exports coffee to the U.S. and Europe.

2.     Services Trade

o    India’s IT services (e.g., software outsourcing to the U.S.).

o    U.K. financial services (e.g., London-based banks serving global clients).

3.     Capital Trade

o    Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – Tesla building a factory in Germany.

o    Portfolio Investments – U.S. investors buying stocks in Japanese companies.

Trade Policies & Organizations

• Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) – NAFTA (now USMCA) between U.S., Canada, Mexico.
• Tariffs & Quotas – U.S. tariffs on Chinese steel to protect domestic producers.
• WTO (World Trade Organization) – Regulates global trade rules.

1.     Mercantilism

The core concept of mercantilism revolved around the idea that the world's wealth (especially in the form of precious metals like gold and silver, known as bullion) was finite. Mercantilism is an economic theory and practice that was dominant in Europe from the 16th to the 18th century. Therefore, for one nation to gain wealth, another nation must lose it. This led to a zero-sum game approach to international trade and economic policy.

It emphasized the role of the state in managing the economy to enhance national power, wealth, and self-sufficiency.

During the British colonial era, British India is a classic example of mercantilism, where economic policies were designed to benefit the imperial power through exploitation of the colony’s resources and markets, leading to long-term economic harm to the Indian subcontinent.Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Principles:

• Wealth equals power: Accumulation of precious metals meant a powerful state.
• Export promotion and import restriction: To ensure a trade surplus.
• Colonial expansion: Colonies served as sources of raw materials and markets for exports.
• Strong state control: Government intervened in the economy to promote national interest.
• Protectionism: Use of tariffs and quotas to restrict imports.

Mercantilism in British Colonial India

1.     India as a Raw Material Source:

India supplied raw materials like cotton, indigo, jute, opium, and tea to fuel British industries.

These materials were exported at low cost to Britain.

2.     India as a Captive Market:

Indian markets were flooded with British manufactured goods.

Heavy import of British goods and destruction of Indian industries made India dependent on Britain.

3.     Deindustrialization of Indian Economy:

British policies ruined Indian handicrafts and textile industries (e.g., Bengal textile sector).

Indian goods faced heavy export duties, while British goods entered duty-free.

4.     Monopoly and Trade Control:

The British East India Company held trade monopolies.

Indian traders and producers had limited rights and faced restrictions.

5.     Infrastructure for Colonial Exploitation:

Railways, roads, and ports were built to extract and export resources efficiently.

These were not intended for the economic development of India.

6.     Drain of Wealth:

Large amounts of Indian wealth were transferred to Britain without fair compensation.

Dadabhai Naoroji described this as the "Drain of Wealth."

7.     High Taxation and Famines:

Heavy land revenue and export of food grains led to poverty and repeated famines.

Resources were prioritized for export over local needs.

8.     Suppression of Indian Industry:

Indians were discouraged or prohibited from developing industries that could compete with British firms.

Assumptions of Mercantilism

• Finite wealth: Wealth (especially gold and silver) is limited; thus, nations must compete to obtain a larger share.
• Zero-sum game: One country's gain is another's loss.
• Trade is inherently competitive, not cooperative.
• National interest supersedes individual or global welfare.
• State intervention is essential to direct economic activity.
• Colonies exist primarily to serve the mother country's economic interests.

Merits of Mercantilism

• Nation-building: Helped in strengthening central governments and forming modern nation-states.
• Industrial growth: Encouraged domestic manufacturing through subsidies and support.
• Infrastructure development: Mercantilist policies led to the building of roads, ports, and ships to promote trade.
• Promotion of exports: Laid the foundation for a global trade system.
• Colonial expansion and global integration (though exploitative, it connected economies worldwide).

Demerits of Mercantilism

• Colonial exploitation: Colonies were heavily exploited for raw materials and denied fair trade.
• Suppression of free trade: Overemphasis on protectionism stifled economic freedom and efficiency.
• Neglect of consumer interests: High prices and limited choices due to import restrictions.
• Stagnation and inequality: Focus on bullion accumulation neglected broader development.
• War and conflict: Competition for wealth and colonies led to frequent wars.

Is Mercantilism Possible or Relevant Today?

Modern Relevance:
While classical mercantilism is largely outdated, neo-mercantilist tendencies still exist in modern economic policies. Many countries adopt protectionist measures and focus on export-led growth, echoing mercantilist logic.

Contemporary Examples of Neo-Mercantilism:

• China’s export-driven model: Heavy state involvement in guiding industries, currency management, and promoting exports.
• U.S. tariffs under the Trump administration: "America First" trade policies and trade wars (especially with China).
• India’s Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India): Promotes domestic production and reduces dependence on imports.

Can it fully work today?

No, not fully. While elements can be used strategically, full-scale mercantilism is incompatible with the modern globalized economy for the following reasons:

Interdependence: Nations are deeply interconnected through global supply chains.

International institutions: WTO, IMF, and trade agreements discourage extreme protectionism.

Inflationary risks: Hoarding gold or suppressing imports may cause domestic inflation and inefficiencies.

Retaliation: Protectionist policies often provoke trade wars, harming global and national interests.

Shift in value systems: Emphasis today is more on sustainable, inclusive, and cooperative economic growth.

Porter’s Diamond Theory

Developed by Michael Porter in 1990, the Diamond Model (also called the Theory of National Competitive Advantage) explains why certain industries in specific nations become globally competitive. Unlike traditional trade theories (e.g., comparative advantage), Porter argues that national competitiveness depends on dynamic factors like innovation, competition, and strategic industry clusters, rather than just natural resources or labor costs.

Porter’s Diamond Model identifies four key determinants that shape a nation’s competitive advantage in specific industries. These factors interact dynamically, creating an environment where industries can thrive globally.

1.     Factor Conditions:

This determinant goes beyond simple availability. Porter emphasizes the distinction between basic factors and advanced factors, and also between generalized factors and specialized factors.

Basic Factors: These are naturally endowed or easily acquired, such as natural resources (e.g., oil fields, fertile land), climate, location, and unskilled labor. While they can provide an initial advantage, they are often easily imitated or purchased by foreign competitors. For example, a country might have vast oil reserves, but unless it develops advanced extraction and refining technologies, and a skilled workforce to manage them, the long-term competitive advantage might be limited.

Advanced Factors: These are created through investment in education, research, and infrastructure. Examples include a highly skilled workforce (engineers, scientists, designers), a sophisticated knowledge base (universities, research institutions), modern communication and transportation infrastructure, and accessible capital markets. These factors are much harder for competitors to imitate and are crucial for sustained competitive advantage.

Generalized vs. Specialized Factors: Generalized factors (e.g., a general education system, broad financial capital) can be useful in many industries.

Specialized factors (e.g., a university specializing in nanotechnology, a venture capital firm focused on biotech startups) are highly tailored to a specific industry and are more critical for developing deep, specialized competitive advantages.

Porter's Key Insight: A nation does not inherit but creates the most important factors of production. A lack of basic factors can even be an advantage, forcing companies to innovate and develop advanced, specialized factors (e.g., Japan's lack of raw materials led to expertise in miniaturization and efficient resource use).

Japan, famously resource-poor, has cultivated world-leading expertise in robotics, advanced materials, and precision manufacturing. This stems from decades of investment in highly specialized engineering education, strong industry-university collaboration for R&D, and sophisticated manufacturing infrastructure. These are advanced and specialized factor conditions that are difficult for other nations to replicate quickly.

2.     Demand Conditions:

This refers to the characteristics of the domestic market for an industry's products or services. It's not just about the size of the market, but its quality and sophistication.

Demanding Customers: When domestic customers are discerning, knowledgeable, and have high expectations regarding quality, features, and performance, they push companies to innovate relentlessly. This constant pressure to meet stringent domestic demands prepares firms to compete effectively in more diverse and demanding international markets.

Anticipating Global Trends: A strong domestic demand that mirrors or anticipates global trends can give local firms an early advantage. They can test new products and refine their offerings in their home market before expanding internationally.

Specialized Demand: Specific national tastes or needs can foster specialized industries that later find global niches.

Porter's Key Insight: Domestic buyers "pull" companies to innovate and upgrade. They act as a critical early warning system for future market needs and trends.

South Korea's highly connected and tech-savvy population, with a strong demand for cutting-edge smartphones, smart home devices, and fast internet services, has significantly driven Samsung's relentless innovation in electronics. Korean consumers quickly adopt new technologies and demand high performance and rich features, forcing Samsung (and its domestic rivals) to continuously push the boundaries of product development, which then translates into global competitiveness.

3.     Related and Supporting Industries:

This refers to the presence within a nation of internationally competitive supplier industries and other related industries that provide inputs, technology, and services to the core industry.

Clusters: Competitive advantage often arises from "clusters" of industries that are geographically concentrated and mutually supportive. This allows for rapid information flow, collaboration, and specialized expertise.

Cost-Effective Inputs: When local suppliers are competitive and innovative, they provide the core industry with high-quality, cost-effective, and timely inputs, reducing reliance on distant or less reliable foreign sources.

Innovation Spillover: Close proximity and interaction among related industries lead to knowledge spillovers, informal sharing of ideas, and the co-development of new technologies and processes. This synergy fosters a dynamic environment for innovation.

Creation of New Industries: A strong cluster can also lead to the spawning of entirely new, related industries as firms identify new opportunities or specialize further.

Porter's Key Insight: A robust ecosystem of supporting industries creates a virtuous cycle of innovation and efficiency, making the entire cluster more competitive.

Italy's preeminence in high fashion (clothing, luxury goods) is not just about its famous designers. It's underpinned by a sophisticated network of highly skilled textile manufacturers, leather goods suppliers, specialized machinery producers, design schools, and skilled artisans, all located in close proximity. This dense cluster allows for rapid prototyping, quality control, and the seamless exchange of creative ideas and technical expertise.

4.     Firm Strategy, Structure, and Rivalry:

This determinant encompasses the way companies are created, organized, and managed in a nation, and critically, the intensity of domestic competition.

Domestic Rivalry: This is arguably the most powerful stimulant for competitive advantage. Fierce domestic competition forces companies to continuously innovate, improve productivity, reduce costs, enhance quality, and find unique ways to differentiate themselves. Companies that survive and thrive in an intensely competitive home market are well-prepared to face global rivals. Without strong domestic rivalry, firms can become complacent and less competitive internationally.

Management Styles and Organizational Structures: The prevailing management philosophies and organizational structures within a nation can significantly influence a firm's ability to compete. For instance, some national cultures might favor hierarchical structures, while others might encourage flatter, more agile organizations, each with implications for innovation and responsiveness.

Goals of Firms and Individuals: The objectives that companies set for themselves (e.g., market share vs. profitability, long-term growth vs. short-term gains) and the career aspirations of their employees also play a role.

Porter's Key Insight: Domestic rivalry is more direct and immediate than international competition, serving as a powerful "crucible" that forges strong, globally competitive firms.

Germany's automotive industry, with giants like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Porsche (all part of larger groups but distinct brands competing fiercely), exemplifies intense domestic rivalry. This competition among top-tier brands on quality, engineering, innovation (e.g., electric vehicles, autonomous driving), and performance has consistently pushed them to excel, making them global leaders in the luxury and performance segments.

3. Considerations (How the Diamond Works)

• The components are interconnected and mutually reinforcing.
• Nations gain competitive advantage in industries where the diamond is strongest.
• The theory emphasizes dynamic processes like innovation, upgrading, and productivity.
• Clusters (geographic concentrations of interconnected companies and institutions) amplify the effect.

4. Limitations / Criticism of Porter’s Diamond Theory

1.     Too Home-Country Focused:

Overemphasizes domestic environment while ignoring global supply chains and multinational enterprises.

In today’s world, companies often source inputs and talent internationally.

2.     Less Relevant for Developing Countries:

Assumes the existence of sophisticated domestic markets and industries.

Many developing nations lack strong factor conditions or related industries.

3.     Ignores Role of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI):

The model doesn’t fully explain how foreign companies contribute to competitiveness in a host nation.

4.     Limited Explanation for Small or Resource-Rich Economies:

Countries like Qatar or UAE have competitive advantages due to natural resources, not diamond factors.

5.     Static Framework:

Critics argue it doesn’t fully capture rapidly changing global dynamics, digital disruption, or geopolitical factors.

The Success of Germany in the Automotive Industry

Factor Conditions: Highly skilled engineers, world-class infrastructure.

Demand Conditions: Quality-focused domestic consumers demand safe, innovative cars.

Related Industries: Strong engineering, steel, electronics sectors.

Firm Strategy & Rivalry: Intense local competition among Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Audi, etc.

Government: Vocational training and research support.

Chance: Post-WWII reconstruction drove industrial development and innovation.

New Trade Theory

New Trade Theory argues that international trade is not only driven by differences in resources or technology but also by economies of scale, network effects, and increasing returns to scale. It explains why countries with similar resources and technologies still engage in intra-industry trade (e.g., both Germany and Japan export cars).

New Trade Theory (NTT) emerged in the late 1970s and early 1980s, primarily developed by economists like Paul Krugman (Nobel Prize winner, 2008). It challenges the classical and neoclassical trade theories (like Ricardian and Heckscher-Ohlin models), which focused on comparative advantage and factor endowments.

Key Reasons for the Emergence of New Trade Theory (NTT)

New Trade Theory emerged because earlier models couldn't explain several key realities of modern global trade—especially the high volume of trade between similar countries, intra-industry exchanges, the role of large firms, economies of scale, and consumer preferences for variety. By integrating concepts like increasing returns to scale, product differentiation, and imperfect competition, NTT provided a more realistic and comprehensive framework for understanding international trade patterns in the 20th and 21st centuries.

1. Inability of Classical Theories to Explain Intra-Industry Trade: Traditional trade theories, such as Ricardian Comparative Advantage and the Heckscher-Ohlin model, predicted that countries would specialize in producing and exporting goods based on their relative advantages in resources or productivity. For instance, labor-rich countries would export textiles, while capital-rich nations would export machinery. However, by the mid-20th century, a growing portion of global trade occurred within the same industries—known as intra-industry trade. Examples include Germany and France both exporting and importing cars, or the UK both importing and exporting beer. These patterns occurred between countries with similar economic structures, which classical theories could not adequately explain.

2. Trade Between Economically Similar Countries: Classical models assumed that the most significant trade would happen between countries with contrasting factor endowments or technological capabilities. In contrast, real-world data showed that most global trade takes place between developed countries with similar income levels, technologies, and resources. This contradicted traditional assumptions and highlighted the need for a new framework to explain such trade dynamics.

3. Importance of Economies of Scale: Old theories generally assumed constant or diminishing returns to scale—where producing more didn’t lead to cost reductions. However, in many modern industries (like technology, manufacturing, and services), increasing returns to scale are common: as production volume rises, the average cost per unit decreases. This creates incentives for firms to scale up beyond the domestic market and look for international buyers to maintain efficiency—something traditional theories did not account for.

4. Consumer Demand for Variety and Product Differentiation: Classical trade models treated goods as uniform and interchangeable (e.g., "wheat" or "cloth"). In reality, consumers across countries desire variety and differentiated products—for example, different brands, styles, and models of cars, clothes, or electronics. This means that countries may simultaneously export and import variations of the same product, leading to intra-industry trade, which older theories failed to explain.

5. Presence of Imperfect Competition: Traditional models assumed perfect competition, where firms are price takers with no control over market outcomes. However, many global industries operate under imperfect competition, such as monopolistic competition or oligopoly. Firms in these markets have some power to set prices and compete strategically. The existence of few, large firms and product differentiation—driven by economies of scale—makes such competition the norm in real-world trade, not the exception.

Limitations / Criticism of New Trade Theory

Government Intervention Risks	Subsidies and protection may lead to inefficiency or trade wars.
Assumes Large Markets	Not applicable to small economies that can't achieve scale easily.
Difficult to Identify Winners	Governments may support wrong industries.
Ignores Environmental and Social Costs	Focuses on scale and trade, not sustainability or equity.
Less Relevant for Basic Commodities	More applicable to high-tech, manufacturing, or branded goods than raw materials.

---